Lacks front light. Interesting look, perhaps somewhat forced or static position. I'd improve the lighting to give it more interest. Although I don't know what the author's intention is. I do not know if it is an exercise or a clear exercise of artistic expression. I hope my opinion serves you. Although good, very good.
You know, I'm turning the image around. He suggests to me beyond the technique, the past scene, the function, represented by the spotlight behind him, that if you have succeeded. I like the image. I would like more dramatic front lighting. Or only more contrasted.
3 comments
gustavoarielrojas95
I WAIT YOUR CONSTRUCTION CRITICISMS THANKS
See original
Hide original
gallegoespinosa
Lacks front light. Interesting look, perhaps somewhat forced or static position. I'd improve the lighting to give it more interest. Although I don't know what the author's intention is. I do not know if it is an exercise or a clear exercise of artistic expression. I hope my opinion serves you. Although good, very good.
See original
Hide original
gallegoespinosa
You know, I'm turning the image around. He suggests to me beyond the technique, the past scene, the function, represented by the spotlight behind him, that if you have succeeded. I like the image. I would like more dramatic front lighting. Or only more contrasted.
See original
Hide original
Log in or join for Free to comment